To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
• 
Oh, that’s GOOOD!
Sounds like an expanded take on the ole George Carlin bit.
Back in the GEnie days I came up with a third position on the abortion issue, which I called “Pro-Rights.”
About a decade later, I posted this as my very first poll question on an opinion forum that now no longer allows logins.
My only problem is the implication (ok, the inference on my part) that all or most pro-life people are like the bad example in the story (I drew the inference from the blog post, not the story itself). I know waaaay to many pro-life folks who do live up to those high standard. The folks who run the foundation in Oklahoma with a goal to get every foster kid into a home and out of the group facilities (they did) are pro-life. My grandparents, who adopted 2 kids and fostered over 200 over the years were very pro-life. I think a venn diagram of folks who are actively pro-life and those who participate in foster programs, church charity, and such would show a pretty large overlap.
I do however agree that pro life does and should mean pro life, not pro 9 months, and there are folks that forget that.
Okay, I read it, but have not changed my opinion: Terminating (killing) an unborn child is a vicious, barbaric & poor solution to what may be only a temporary problem.
And will happen whether it’s legal or not. Better that it is done safely and cleanly so that the woman doesn’t have to pay for her decision with her life.
PAD
It’s not just a seemingly single mother having trouble handling children from apparently different fathers and needing a little financial assistance. It’s also being pro-gun even after yet another mass shooting. It’s also being pro death penalty. And, in the case of politicians, it’s being all of those things while claiming to be pro-life, with his constituents not being smart enough to comprehend the discrepancy.